No 10 furore is latest chapter in long, dark history of racist science - 2020-02-17

From UmbraXenu
Jump to: navigation, search
F345.png No 10 furore is latest chapter in long, dark history of racist science February 17, 2020, Ian Sample, The Guardian

The notion that members of one race are inherently more intelligent than members of another – brought back into circulation by the appointment of Andrew Sabisky, who claims that black Americans have a lower average IQ than white people, as a Downing Street adviser – is an idea with a deep and disturbing history.

In modern times, the study most often rolled out as supporting "evidence" is a 2006 work from the English psychologist Richard Lynn. In the publication, Lynn concluded that black Africans had an average IQ of less than 70, compared with the average western IQ of 100. This, he claimed, explained the low level of economic development in sub-Saharan Africa.

It was four years before the work was roundly discredited. In 2010, researchers found that Lynn had systematically ignored Africans with high IQ scores, but that was far from the only problem they uncovered, and at the end of their analysis they declared there was no evidence to support Lynn's claims.

Wikipedia cite:
{{cite news | first = Ian | last = Sample | title = No 10 furore is latest chapter in long, dark history of racist science | url = https://www.theguardian.com/science/2020/feb/17/no-10-andrew-sabisky-furore-latest-chapter-long-history-racist-science | work = The Guardian | date = February 17, 2020 | accessdate = February 18, 2020 }}