What the Supreme Court Needs to Find Out - 2013-10-30

From UmbraXenu
Jump to: navigation, search
F0.png What the Supreme Court Needs to Find Out October 30, 2013, Paula J. Caplan, Psychology Today

For five minutes I felt gratified, thinking my report that many psychiatric diagnostic categories are unscientific had been helpful. Then I saw that what the Clark v. Arizona decision, the last in the Court's most recent term, included was a serious mischaracterization and misapplication of my work. I wondered how the Court had heard of my book and soon discovered that the writer of an amicus curiae brief had cited it in a way that, through implication and omission, was misleading.

When I discovered that the "Citizens Commission on Human Rights" (CCHR) had submitted that brief, it struck me that a Justice would be unlikely to know that the [so-called] Church of Scientology founded and remains closely tied to the CCHR.

I wondered: Does the Supreme Court have mechanisms to find out the nature of groups that submit amicus briefs, and does the Court have mechanisms to figure out whether scientific research and clinicians' opinions in briefs are of good quality and accurately presented?

Wikipedia cite:
{{cite news | first = Paula J. | last = Caplan | title = What the Supreme Court Needs to Find Out | url = https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/science-isnt-golden/201310/what-the-supreme-court-needs-find-out | work = Psychology Today | date = October 30, 2013 | accessdate = February 7, 2019 }}