Why Scheer's defenders are pointing to the 2004 election now - and why the argument doesn't hold up - 2019-12-03

From UmbraXenu
Jump to: navigation, search
F182.png Why Scheer's defenders are pointing to the 2004 election now - and why the argument doesn't hold up December 3, 2019, Rosemary Barton, CBC News

In Conservative circles these days, people are searching for lessons about the party's future through a close examination of its past.

Which makes sense. Circumstances change, but there's always something to be learned from the last time things went badly. Under heavy pressure within the party to rationalize the failure to make Justin Trudeau a one-term prime minister, Andrew Scheer and his supporters have been pointing to another time a Conservative leader held a Liberal government to a minority and then faced questions about his leadership.

Sen. Denise Batters, a friend and long-time supporter of Scheer, recently posted a video to Twitter comparing Scheer's performance to Stephen Harper's failure to defeat the Liberals under Paul Martin in 2004.

Wikipedia cite:
{{cite news | first = Rosemary | last = Barton | title = Why Scheer's defenders are pointing to the 2004 election now - and why the argument doesn't hold up | url = https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/andrew-scheer-1.5382443 | work = CBC News | date = December 3, 2019 | accessdate = December 4, 2019 }}