Why herd immunity strategy is regarded as fringe viewpoint - 2020-10-07

From UmbraXenu
Jump to: navigation, search
F345.png Why herd immunity strategy is regarded as fringe viewpoint October 7, 2020, Ian Sample, The Guardian

At first glance it sounds like a no-brainer. Coronavirus is most dangerous to older and unhealthier people, so why not protect them and let the rest of society return to life as normal? It would boost the economy and free the young and fit from the mental and financial burdens of Covid restrictions. In time, as the virus tears through them, they will acquire herd immunity that ultimately helps us all.

The strategy proposed in the Great Barrington declaration – a letter signed by an international group of scientists – is the latest salvo in an ongoing battle of ideas for how to tackle the pandemic. It calls on governments around the world to abandon strategies that suppress the virus until we can better cope – through working test-and-trace programmes, new treatments, vaccines and more – for the radically different approach.

The declaration was drawn up at the American Institute for Economic Research, a right-leaning organisation in Great Barrington, Massachusetts, that promotes individual rights, small government and open markets. It registered a web domain for the document.

Wikipedia cite:
{{cite news | first = Ian | last = Sample | title = Why herd immunity strategy is regarded as fringe viewpoint | url = https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/07/why-herd-immunity-strategy-is-regarded-as-fringe-viewpoint | work = The Guardian | date = October 7, 2020 | accessdate = October 8, 2020 }}