The Apostate: Paul Haggis Vs. the Church of Scientology - 2011-02-14

From UmbraXenu
Jump to: navigation, search
F188.png The Apostate: Paul Haggis Vs. the Church of Scientology February 14, 2011, Lawrence Wright, New Yorker

After the screening, everyone drifted over to the Oak Room of the Plaza Hotel. Haggis was in a corner receiving accolades from his friends when I found him. I asked him if he felt that he had finally left Scientology. "I feel much more myself, but there's a sadness," he admitted. "If you identify yourself with something for so long, and suddenly you think of yourself as not that thing, it leaves a bit of space." He went on, "It's not really the sense of a loss of community. Those people who walked away from me were never really my friends." He understood how they felt about him, and why. "In Scientology, in the Ethics Conditions, as you go down from Normal through Doubt, then you get to Enemy, and, finally, near the bottom, there is Treason. What I did was a treasonous act."

I once asked Haggis about the future of his relationship with Scientology. "These people have long memories," he told me. "My bet is that, within two years, you're going to read something about me in a scandal that looks like it has nothing to do with the church." He thought for a moment, then said, "I was in a cult for thirty-four years. Everyone else could see it. I don't know why I couldn't."

Wikipedia cite:
{{cite news | first = Lawrence | last = Wright | title = The Apostate: Paul Haggis Vs. the Church of Scientology | url = | work = New Yorker | date = February 14, 2011 | accessdate = February 7, 2019 }}