Open main menu

UmbraXenu β

The Federalist Society just became a no-go zone for federal judges - 2019-07-08

F43.png The Federalist Society just became a no-go zone for federal judges July 8, 2019, James P. Donohue, Opinion, Washington Post

"We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges," Supreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. said in a statement issued in November, countering a reference by President Trump to an "Obama judge."

In my experience, federal judges work diligently to keep their personal views out of the judicial process. They would be appalled by the thought that simply noting the president who appointed them is all the public needs to know about what went into a decision. Yet, as much as Roberts and others on the federal bench bemoan attempts to reduce the judiciary to just another political institution, some judges have themselves contributed to the problem.

They have done so as members of the Federalist Society, a network of conservative and libertarian lawyers and legal scholars — it claims 60,000 members — that calls itself a nonpartisan educational organization but increasingly appears to be a political operation in all but name.

Wikipedia cite:
{{cite news | first = James P. | last = Donohue | title = The Federalist Society just became a no-go zone for federal judges | url = https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-federalist-society-just-became-a-no-go-zone-for-federal-judges/2019/07/08/dfb3ee56-9c45-11e9-b27f-ed2942f73d70_story.html | work = Opinion | publisher = Washington Post | date = July 8, 2019 | accessdate = November 13, 2019 }}