Letters - 1950-08-14: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Letters August 14, 1950,
Dr Robotnik (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Dr Robotnik (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
---- |
---- |
||
<span class="entry-content">Our only regret is that you . . . mistook the publisher's synopsis in the book to be the opinion of the author. Los Angeles, while giving dianetics an excellent reception, is not entirely informed as to the science. Secondly, you would seem to make me over-evaluate dianetics in my own opinion. In 50 years a valid opinion as to what dianetics is doing or can do for the whole society may be expressed: I doubt anyone would be foolish enough to express such a wild enthusiasm about his own work, and I do not ...</span> |
<span class="entry-content">Our only regret is that you . . . mistook the publisher's synopsis in the book to be the opinion of the author. Los Angeles, while giving dianetics an excellent reception, is not entirely informed as to the science. Secondly, you would seem to make me over-evaluate dianetics in my own opinion. In 50 years a valid opinion as to what dianetics is doing or can do for the whole society may be expressed: I doubt anyone would be foolish enough to express such a wild enthusiasm about his own work, and I do not ...</span> |
||
| ⚫ | <div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed">Wikipedia cite:<div class="mw-collapsible-content"><nowiki>{{cite news | title = Letters | url = http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,858874,00.html | work = TIME Magazine | date = August 14, 1950 | accessdate = January 14, 2017 }}</nowiki></div></div> |
||
---- |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
[[Category:1950]] |
[[Category:1950]] |
||
[[Category:L. Ron Hubbard]] |
[[Category:L. Ron Hubbard]] |
||
Revision as of 16:48, 8 April 2019
Letters August 14, 1950,
Our only regret is that you . . . mistook the publisher's synopsis in the book to be the opinion of the author. Los Angeles, while giving dianetics an excellent reception, is not entirely informed as to the science. Secondly, you would seem to make me over-evaluate dianetics in my own opinion. In 50 years a valid opinion as to what dianetics is doing or can do for the whole society may be expressed: I doubt anyone would be foolish enough to express such a wild enthusiasm about his own work, and I do not ...
Wikipedia cite:
{{cite news | title = Letters | url = http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,858874,00.html | work = TIME Magazine | date = August 14, 1950 | accessdate = January 14, 2017 }}