Letters - 1950-08-14: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Letters August 14, 1950,
Dr Robotnik (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Dr Robotnik (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="hnews hentry item">[[File:f54.png]] '''<span class="url entry-title">[http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,858874,00.html Letters]</span>''' <span class="updated">August 14, 1950</span>, <span class="author vcard"><span class="org organization-name"> |
<div class="hnews hentry item">[[File:f54.png]] '''<span class="url entry-title">[http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,858874,00.html Letters]</span>''' <span class="updated">August 14, 1950</span>, <span class="author vcard"><span class="org organization-name">Time magazine</span></span> |
||
---- |
---- |
||
<span class="entry-content">Our only regret is that you . . . mistook the publisher's synopsis in the book to be the opinion of the author. Los Angeles, while giving dianetics an excellent reception, is not entirely informed as to the science. Secondly, you would seem to make me over-evaluate dianetics in my own opinion. In 50 years a valid opinion as to what dianetics is doing or can do for the whole society may be expressed: I doubt anyone would be foolish enough to express such a wild enthusiasm about his own work, and I do not ...</span> |
<span class="entry-content">Our only regret is that you . . . mistook the publisher's synopsis in the book to be the opinion of the author. Los Angeles, while giving dianetics an excellent reception, is not entirely informed as to the science. Secondly, you would seem to make me over-evaluate dianetics in my own opinion. In 50 years a valid opinion as to what dianetics is doing or can do for the whole society may be expressed: I doubt anyone would be foolish enough to express such a wild enthusiasm about his own work, and I do not ...</span> |
||
| ⚫ | <div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed">Wikipedia cite:<div class="mw-collapsible-content"><nowiki>{{cite news | title = Letters | url = http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,858874,00.html | work = Time magazine | date = August 14, 1950 | accessdate = May 22, 2019 }}</nowiki></div></div> |
||
---- |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
[[Category:1950]] |
[[Category:1950]] |
||
[[Category:L. Ron Hubbard]] |
[[Category:L. Ron Hubbard]] |
||
[[Category:News article]] |
[[Category:News article]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Time magazine]] |
||
</div> |
</div> |
||
Latest revision as of 04:19, 22 May 2019
Letters August 14, 1950,
Our only regret is that you . . . mistook the publisher's synopsis in the book to be the opinion of the author. Los Angeles, while giving dianetics an excellent reception, is not entirely informed as to the science. Secondly, you would seem to make me over-evaluate dianetics in my own opinion. In 50 years a valid opinion as to what dianetics is doing or can do for the whole society may be expressed: I doubt anyone would be foolish enough to express such a wild enthusiasm about his own work, and I do not ...
Wikipedia cite:
{{cite news | title = Letters | url = http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,858874,00.html | work = Time magazine | date = August 14, 1950 | accessdate = May 22, 2019 }}