Alt.scientology.war - 1995-12-01: Difference between revisions

From UmbraXenu
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="hnews hentry item">[[File:f354.png]] '''<span class="url entry-title">[https://www.wired.com/wired/archive/3.12/alt.scientology.war.html alt.scientology.war]</span>''' <span class="updated">December 1, 1995</span>, <span class="author vcard"><span class="fn">Wendy M. Grossman</span>, Wired 3.12, <span class="org organization-name">Wired</span></span>
<div class="hnews hentry item">[[File:f354.png]] '''<span class="url entry-title">[https://www.wired.com/wired/archive/3.12/alt.scientology.war.html alt.scientology.war]</span>''' <span class="updated">December 1, 1995</span>, <span class="author vcard"><span class="fn">Wendy M. Grossman</span>, Wired 3.12, <span class="org organization-name">Wired</span></span>
----
----
<span class="entry-content">The story of Scientology versus the Net is not a tale of friendly nethead-to-nethead hostilities like 1993's kittens-in-the-microwave flame war between alt.tasteless and rec.pets.cats. This is mortal combat between two alien cultures - two worlds whose common language masks the gulf between them. A flame war with real guns. A fight that has burst the banks of the Net and into the real world of police, lawyers, and armed search and seizure. Ultimately, however, the drama doesn't matter: the real issues here are the boundaries of free speech and the future of copyright and intellectual property in the face of a technology that can scatter copies across the world in seconds. The Church of Scientology will not be the last organization, controversial or otherwise, that seeks to protect its interests against the Net. Technology doesn't care about the motives of its users.</span>
<span class="entry-content">It turns out that a belief in free speech and an interest in Scientology may involve you in the bitterest battle fought across the Internet to date. The story of Scientology versus the Net is not a tale of friendly nethead-to-nethead hostilities like [[:Category:1993|1993]]'s kittens-in-the-microwave flame war between alt.tasteless and rec.pets.cats. This is mortal combat between two alien cultures - two worlds whose common language masks the gulf between them. A flame war with real guns. A fight that has burst the banks of the Net and into the real world of police, lawyers, and armed search and seizure. Ultimately, however, the drama doesn't matter: the real issues here are the boundaries of free speech and the future of copyright and intellectual property in the face of a technology that can scatter copies across the world in seconds. The Church of Scientology will not be the last organization, controversial or otherwise, that seeks to protect its interests against the Net. Technology doesn't care about the motives of its users.

<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed">Wikipedia cite:<div class="mw-collapsible-content"><nowiki>{{cite news | first = Wendy M. | last = Grossman | title = alt.scientology.war | url = https://www.wired.com/wired/archive/3.12/alt.scientology.war.html | work = Wired 3.12 | publisher = Wired | date = December 1, 1995 | accessdate = February 6, 2019 }}</nowiki></div></div>{{#widget:Google PlusOne|size=small|count=true}}
In this story, everyone's motives sound the same: all the participants believe they are benefiting humanity. Scientologists genuinely believe their secrets can save the world, but that they must be doled out only to those who have proven ready to receive them. Followers hold fiercely to the notion that their revered, secret texts must never be disseminated, save to the rigorously initiated, who pay tens of thousands of dollars to study them. [[:Category:Critic|Critic]]s insist the religion is a scam that seeks to take over the minds of its adherents and bilk them of huge sums of money by selling utter nonsense; they feel that exposing these truths - and the secret texts - to the eyes of the Usenet-reading public is protecting that public from exploitation.

Whatever the motives, when computers are seized because they contain allegedly purloined intellectual property, messages are intercepted as they traverse the network, or the security of anonymous remailers is pierced by police, the days of the Internet as a cozy, private, intellectual cocktail party are over. Welcome to real politics.</span>
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed">Wikipedia cite:<div class="mw-collapsible-content"><nowiki>{{cite news | first = Wendy M. | last = Grossman | title = alt.scientology.war | url = https://www.wired.com/wired/archive/3.12/alt.scientology.war.html | work = Wired 3.12 | publisher = Wired | date = December 1, 1995 | accessdate = February 6, 2019 }}</nowiki></div></div>
[[Category:1982]]
[[Category:1986]]
[[Category:1990]]
[[Category:1991]]
[[Category:1993]]
[[Category:1994]]
[[Category:1995]]
[[Category:1995]]
[[Category:2003]]
[[Category:2004]]
[[Category:Alt.religion.scientology]]
[[Category:alt.scientology.war]]
[[Category:alt.scientology.war]]
[[Category:anon.penet.fi]]
[[Category:anon.penet.fi]]
[[Category:Arlington]]
[[Category:Arnaldo Lerma]]
[[Category:Arnaldo Lerma]]
[[Category:Bob Penny]]
[[Category:Boston University]]
[[Category:Bridge Publications]]
[[Category:Burglary]]
[[Category:California]]
[[Category:Canada]]
[[Category:Christmas]]
[[Category:Church of Scientology International]]
[[Category:Colorado]]
[[Category:Copyright]]
[[Category:Critic]]
[[Category:David Miscavige]]
[[Category:Dennis Erlich]]
[[Category:Dennis Erlich]]
[[Category:Dublin]]
[[Category:Dutch]]
[[Category:Earle Cooley]]
[[Category:Elaine Siegel]]
[[Category:Electronic Frontier Foundation]]
[[Category:Electronic Frontier Foundation]]
[[Category:FACTNet]]
[[Category:FACTNet]]
[[Category:FBI]]
[[Category:Finland]]
[[Category:Free Zone]]
[[Category:Germany]]
[[Category:Glendale]]
[[Category:Grady Ward]]
[[Category:Grady Ward]]
[[Category:Helena Kobrin]]
[[Category:Helena Kobrin]]
[[Category:Johan Helsingius]]
[[Category:Judge Brinkema]]
[[Category:Judge Brinkema]]
[[Category:Judge John Kane]]
[[Category:Judge John Kane]]
[[Category:Judge Leonie Brinkema]]
[[Category:Judge Whyte]]
[[Category:Lawrence Wollersheim]]
[[Category:Lawrence Wollersheim]]
[[Category:Legal]]
[[Category:Legal]]
[[Category:Leisa Goodman]]
[[Category:London]]
[[Category:Los Angeles]]
[[Category:Netcom]]
[[Category:News article]]
[[Category:News article]]
[[Category:Office of Special Affairs]]
[[Category:Operating Thetan]]
[[Category:Police]]
[[Category:Pope]]
[[Category:Religious Technology Center]]
[[Category:Robert Vaughn Young]]
[[Category:Robert Vaughn Young]]
[[Category:San Francisco]]
[[Category:San Jose]]
[[Category:Scamizdat]]
[[Category:Scott Goehring]]
[[Category:Stu Sjouwerman]]
[[Category:Stu Sjouwerman]]
[[Category:Suppressive Person]]
[[Category:Thomas Small]]
[[Category:Thomas Small]]
[[Category:Tom Klemesrud]]
[[Category:Tom Klemesrud]]
[[Category:UK]]
[[Category:University of California]]
[[Category:US District Court]]
[[Category:Vietnam]]
[[Category:Virginia]]
[[Category:Washington Post]]
[[Category:Wendy Grossman]]
[[Category:Wendy M. Grossman]]
[[Category:Wendy M. Grossman]]
[[Category:Wired]]
[[Category:Wired]]

Latest revision as of 14:56, 9 August 2019

F354.png alt.scientology.war December 1, 1995, Wendy M. Grossman, Wired 3.12, Wired

It turns out that a belief in free speech and an interest in Scientology may involve you in the bitterest battle fought across the Internet to date. The story of Scientology versus the Net is not a tale of friendly nethead-to-nethead hostilities like 1993's kittens-in-the-microwave flame war between alt.tasteless and rec.pets.cats. This is mortal combat between two alien cultures - two worlds whose common language masks the gulf between them. A flame war with real guns. A fight that has burst the banks of the Net and into the real world of police, lawyers, and armed search and seizure. Ultimately, however, the drama doesn't matter: the real issues here are the boundaries of free speech and the future of copyright and intellectual property in the face of a technology that can scatter copies across the world in seconds. The Church of Scientology will not be the last organization, controversial or otherwise, that seeks to protect its interests against the Net. Technology doesn't care about the motives of its users.

In this story, everyone's motives sound the same: all the participants believe they are benefiting humanity. Scientologists genuinely believe their secrets can save the world, but that they must be doled out only to those who have proven ready to receive them. Followers hold fiercely to the notion that their revered, secret texts must never be disseminated, save to the rigorously initiated, who pay tens of thousands of dollars to study them. Critics insist the religion is a scam that seeks to take over the minds of its adherents and bilk them of huge sums of money by selling utter nonsense; they feel that exposing these truths - and the secret texts - to the eyes of the Usenet-reading public is protecting that public from exploitation.

Whatever the motives, when computers are seized because they contain allegedly purloined intellectual property, messages are intercepted as they traverse the network, or the security of anonymous remailers is pierced by police, the days of the Internet as a cozy, private, intellectual cocktail party are over. Welcome to real politics.

Wikipedia cite:
{{cite news | first = Wendy M. | last = Grossman | title = alt.scientology.war | url = https://www.wired.com/wired/archive/3.12/alt.scientology.war.html | work = Wired 3.12 | publisher = Wired | date = December 1, 1995 | accessdate = February 6, 2019 }}