Category:Didier Raoult: Difference between revisions

From UmbraXenu
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
| birth_place = [[Wikipedia:Dakar|Dakar]], [[Wikipedia:French West Africa|French West Africa]] (present-day [[Wikipedia:Senegal|Senegal]])
| birth_place = [[Wikipedia:Dakar|Dakar]], [[Wikipedia:French West Africa|French West Africa]] (present-day [[Wikipedia:Senegal|Senegal]])
}}
}}
=== Accusations of falsified images, and legal threats===
On May 5, 2021, [[:Category:Elisabeth Bik|Elisabeth Bik]] (who specializes in identifying manipulated images in scientific papers) raised concerns about dozens of Raoult's papers—including ethical, procedural, and methodological problems in a March 2020 paper reporting success in a small hydroxychloroquine trial. Raoult's lawyer subsequently announced that Raoult was accusing and suing a scientific integrity consultant of harassment and blackmail.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-05-10|title=L'IHU contre-attaque et porte plainte pour harcèlement et extorsion de fonds|url=https://www.francesoir.fr/societe-sante/lihu-contre-attaque-et-porte-plainte-pour-harcelement-et-extorsion-de-fonds|accessdate=2021-06-05|website=FranceSoir|language=fr}}</ref> The French non profit association Citizen4Science, formed by scientists and citizens, published a press release and a petition that day, denouncing the harassment of scientists and defenders of science integrity,<ref>{{Cite web|last1=p|first1=More profit on|last2=Dit|first2=Emic-Ocasapiens|date=2021-05-05|title=PRESS RELEASE #5|url=https://citizen4science.org/press-release-5/|accessdate=2021-06-05|website=Citizen4Science|language=fr-FR}}</ref> specifically defending Bik and calling on French authorities to intervene and for journalists to look into the matter. Several French newspapers immediately reported Citizen4Science's initiative.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-05-12|title=Karine Lacombe : "Si on fait comme si l'épidémie était finie, la gifle risque d'être forte"|url=https://www.lexpress.fr/actualite/sciences/karine-lacombe-si-on-fait-comme-si-l-epidemie-etait-finie-la-gifle-risque-d-etre-forte_2150583.html|accessdate=2021-06-05|website=LExpress.fr|language=fr}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last1=LIBERATION|last2=AFP|title=Le Sommet sur les économies africaines demande la levée des brevets sur les vaccins contre le Covid-19|url=https://www.liberation.fr/societe/sante/retrouvez-les-dernieres-informations-sur-la-crise-sanitaire-liee-a-la-pandemie-de-covid-19-20210518_2DNQWETKINCUVKM3PJ6KB5FT6I/|accessdate=2021-06-05|website=Libération|language=fr}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|date=2021-05-18|title=Didier Raoult entame un bras de fer judiciaire contre une spécialiste de l'intégrité scientifique|language=fr|work=Le Monde.fr|url=https://www.lemonde.fr/sciences/article/2021/05/18/bras-de-fer-judiciaire-entre-didier-raoult-et-une-specialiste-de-l-integrite-scientifique_6080545_1650684.html|accessdate=2021-06-05}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Pourquoi Didier Raoult porte plainte contre Elisabeth Bik, la chasseuse de fraude|url=https://www.heidi.news/sante/pourquoi-didier-raoult-porte-plainte-contre-elisabeth-bik-la-chasseuse-de-fraude|accessdate=2021-06-05|website=www.heidi.news|language=fr}}</ref> The petition was signed by thousands of scientists and citizens throughout the world. By May 22, 2021 that Raoult had begun legal proceedings against Bik<ref name="Guardian">{{Cite web|date=2021-05-22|title=World expert in scientific misconduct faces legal action for challenging integrity of hydroxychloroquine study|url=http://www.theguardian.com/science/2021/may/22/world-expert-in-scientific-misconduct-faces-legal-action-for-challenging-integrity-of-hydroxychloroquine-study|accessdate=2021-06-05|website=the Guardian|language=en}}</ref> this was followed by various articles in international mainstream medias<ref>{{Cite web|last=Dieng|first=Cheikh|date=2021-05-23|title=Covid-19 : des scientifiques internationaux déclarent la guerre à Raoult et l'accusent de harcèlement|url=https://lecourrier-du-soir.com/covid-19-des-scientifiques-internationaux-declarent-la-guerre-a-raoult-et-laccusent-de-harcelement/|accessdate=2021-06-05|website=Le courrier du soir|language=fr-FR}}</ref> and an article in [[Wikipedia:Science (journal)|Science]] updated on June 4, 2021 at the occasion of the print issue 6546, stating >3,000 signatories for Citizen4Science petition.<ref name="science">{{Cite journal|last=O'Grady|first=Cathleen|date=2021-06-04|title=Image sleuth faces legal threats|url=https://science.sciencemag.org/content/372/6546/1021|journal=Science|language=en|volume=372|issue=6546|pages=1021–1022|bibcode=2021Sci...372.1021O|doi=10.1126/science.372.6546.1021|issn=0036-8075|pmid=34083467}}</ref>

On May 18, 2021, [[Wikipedia:Lonni Besançon|Lonni Besançon]], a French postdoctoral research fellow at [[Wikipedia:Monash University|Monash University]], wrote an open letter to support Elisabeth Bik.<ref name="besancon-etal-2021">
{{cite book
| last1 = Besançon | first1 = Lonni
| last2 = Samuel | first2 = Alexander
| last3 = Sana | first3 = Thibault
| last4 = Rebeaud | first4 = Mathieu
| last5 = Guihur | first5 = Anthony
| last6 = Robinson-Rechavi | first6 = Marc
| last7 = Berre | first7 = Nicolas Le
| last8 = Mulot | first8 = Matthieu
| last9 = Meyerowitz-Katz | first9 = Gideon
| last10 = Maisonneuve
| last11 = Nosek | first11 = Brian A
| title = Open letter: Scientists stand up to protect academic whistleblowers and post-publication peer review
| date = 18 May 2021
| doi = 10.31219/osf.io/2awsv
| url = https://osf.io/2awsv/
| accessdate = 2021-05-22
}}</ref> The letter was co-signed by more than 2200 scientists and 30 [[Wikipedia:scholarly society|scholarly societies]].<ref name="suppmaterialletter">
{{cite book
| last1 = Besançon | first1 = Lonni
| last2 = Samuel | first2 = Alexander
| last3 = Sana | first3 = Thibault
| last4 = Rebeaud | first4 = Mathieu
| last5 = Guihur | first5 = Anthony
| last6 = Robinson-Rechavi | first6 = Marc
| last7 = Berre | first7 = Nicolas Le
| last8 = Mulot | first8 = Matthieu
| last9 = Meyerowitz-Katz | first9 = Gideon
| last10 = Maisonneuve
| last11 = Nosek | first11 = Brian A
| title = Supplementary materials of "Open letter: Scientists stand up to protect academic whistleblowers and post-publication peer review"
| date = 8 May 2021
| doi = 10.17605/OSF.IO/ZKX5H
| url = http://dx.doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ZKX5H
| accessdate = 2021-06-10}}</ref>

On June 1, 2021, [[Wikipedia:French National Centre for Scientific Research|CNRS]] published a press release<ref>{{Cite web|last=y{r{{!}}lruuj7mjlqn{Ilw{{{!}}7o{|first=Priscilla Dacher Responsable du bureau de presse du CNRS 4<<):)==)B?)=?)9?)|title=Les prétoires ne sont pas des laboratoires {{!}} CNRS|url=https://www.cnrs.fr/fr/les-pretoires-ne-sont-pas-des-laboratoires|accessdate=2021-06-07|website=www.cnrs.fr|language=fr}}</ref> denouncing the "judiciarization of controversy and scientific debates", condemning Raoult's legal proceedings against [[:Category:Elisabeth Bik|Elisabeth Bik]]. On June 10, 2021 French Senator [[Wikipedia:Bernard Jomier|Bernard Jomier]] carried the Citizen4Science press release and petition to the French [[Wikipedia:Senate|Senate]] through a written question to French Minister of Health [[Wikipedia:Olivier Véran|Olivier Véran]], requiring action to protect bearers of science integrity.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Site du sénat|url=https://www.senat.fr/basile/visio.do?id=qSEQ210623282&idtable=q354487%7Cq397890%7Cq390460%7Cq381719%7Cq370118%7Cq398561%7Cq376184%7Cq372285%7Cq376427&_c=parole+scientifique&rch=qs&de=20180611&au=20210611&dp=3+ans&radio=dp&aff=sep&tri=p&off=0&afd=ppr&afd=ppl&afd=pjl&afd=cvn|accessdate=2021-06-11|website=www.senat.fr}}</ref>

==See also==
*{{Wikipedia-inline|Didier Raoult}}
==Notes==
{{Reflist|33em}}

{{DEFAULTSORT: Raoult, Didier}}
{{DEFAULTSORT: Raoult, Didier}}
[[Category:Covidiot]]
[[Category:Covidiot]]

Latest revision as of 23:07, 18 October 2021

Didier Raoult
Born (1952-03-13) 13 March 1952 (age 72)
Dakar, French West Africa (present-day Senegal)
Occupation Doctor

Accusations of falsified images, and legal threats

On May 5, 2021, Elisabeth Bik (who specializes in identifying manipulated images in scientific papers) raised concerns about dozens of Raoult's papers—including ethical, procedural, and methodological problems in a March 2020 paper reporting success in a small hydroxychloroquine trial. Raoult's lawyer subsequently announced that Raoult was accusing and suing a scientific integrity consultant of harassment and blackmail.[1] The French non profit association Citizen4Science, formed by scientists and citizens, published a press release and a petition that day, denouncing the harassment of scientists and defenders of science integrity,[2] specifically defending Bik and calling on French authorities to intervene and for journalists to look into the matter. Several French newspapers immediately reported Citizen4Science's initiative.[3][4][5][6] The petition was signed by thousands of scientists and citizens throughout the world. By May 22, 2021 that Raoult had begun legal proceedings against Bik[7] this was followed by various articles in international mainstream medias[8] and an article in Science updated on June 4, 2021 at the occasion of the print issue 6546, stating >3,000 signatories for Citizen4Science petition.[9]

On May 18, 2021, Lonni Besançon, a French postdoctoral research fellow at Monash University, wrote an open letter to support Elisabeth Bik.[10] The letter was co-signed by more than 2200 scientists and 30 scholarly societies.[11]

On June 1, 2021, CNRS published a press release[12] denouncing the "judiciarization of controversy and scientific debates", condemning Raoult's legal proceedings against Elisabeth Bik. On June 10, 2021 French Senator Bernard Jomier carried the Citizen4Science press release and petition to the French Senate through a written question to French Minister of Health Olivier Véran, requiring action to protect bearers of science integrity.[13]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ "L'IHU contre-attaque et porte plainte pour harcèlement et extorsion de fonds" (in fr). 2021-05-10. https://www.francesoir.fr/societe-sante/lihu-contre-attaque-et-porte-plainte-pour-harcelement-et-extorsion-de-fonds. Retrieved 2021-06-05.
  2. ↑ p, More profit on; Dit, Emic-Ocasapiens (2021-05-05). "PRESS RELEASE #5" (in fr-FR). https://citizen4science.org/press-release-5/. Retrieved 2021-06-05.
  3. ↑ "Karine Lacombe : "Si on fait comme si l'épidémie était finie, la gifle risque d'être forte"" (in fr). 2021-05-12. https://www.lexpress.fr/actualite/sciences/karine-lacombe-si-on-fait-comme-si-l-epidemie-etait-finie-la-gifle-risque-d-etre-forte_2150583.html. Retrieved 2021-06-05.
  4. ↑ LIBERATION; AFP. "Le Sommet sur les économies africaines demande la levée des brevets sur les vaccins contre le Covid-19" (in fr). https://www.liberation.fr/societe/sante/retrouvez-les-dernieres-informations-sur-la-crise-sanitaire-liee-a-la-pandemie-de-covid-19-20210518_2DNQWETKINCUVKM3PJ6KB5FT6I/. Retrieved 2021-06-05.
  5. ↑ "Didier Raoult entame un bras de fer judiciaire contre une spécialiste de l'intégrité scientifique" (in fr). Le Monde.fr. 2021-05-18. https://www.lemonde.fr/sciences/article/2021/05/18/bras-de-fer-judiciaire-entre-didier-raoult-et-une-specialiste-de-l-integrite-scientifique_6080545_1650684.html. Retrieved 2021-06-05.
  6. ↑ "Pourquoi Didier Raoult porte plainte contre Elisabeth Bik, la chasseuse de fraude" (in fr). https://www.heidi.news/sante/pourquoi-didier-raoult-porte-plainte-contre-elisabeth-bik-la-chasseuse-de-fraude. Retrieved 2021-06-05.
  7. ↑ "World expert in scientific misconduct faces legal action for challenging integrity of hydroxychloroquine study" (in en). 2021-05-22. http://www.theguardian.com/science/2021/may/22/world-expert-in-scientific-misconduct-faces-legal-action-for-challenging-integrity-of-hydroxychloroquine-study. Retrieved 2021-06-05.
  8. ↑ Dieng, Cheikh (2021-05-23). "Covid-19 : des scientifiques internationaux déclarent la guerre à Raoult et l'accusent de harcèlement" (in fr-FR). https://lecourrier-du-soir.com/covid-19-des-scientifiques-internationaux-declarent-la-guerre-a-raoult-et-laccusent-de-harcelement/. Retrieved 2021-06-05.
  9. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  10. ↑ Besançon, Lonni; Samuel, Alexander; Sana, Thibault; Rebeaud, Mathieu; Guihur, Anthony; Robinson-Rechavi, Marc; Berre, Nicolas Le; Mulot, Matthieu et al. (18 May 2021). Open letter: Scientists stand up to protect academic whistleblowers and post-publication peer review. Error: Bad DOI specifiedTemplate:Namespace detect showall. https://osf.io/2awsv/. Retrieved 2021-05-22.
  11. ↑ Besançon, Lonni; Samuel, Alexander; Sana, Thibault; Rebeaud, Mathieu; Guihur, Anthony; Robinson-Rechavi, Marc; Berre, Nicolas Le; Mulot, Matthieu et al. (8 May 2021). Supplementary materials of "Open letter: Scientists stand up to protect academic whistleblowers and post-publication peer review". Error: Bad DOI specifiedTemplate:Namespace detect showall. http://dx.doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ZKX5H. Retrieved 2021-06-10.
  12. ↑ y{r|lruuj7mjlqn{Ilw{|7o{, Priscilla Dacher Responsable du bureau de presse du CNRS 4<<):)==)B?)=?)9?). "Les prétoires ne sont pas des laboratoires | CNRS" (in fr). https://www.cnrs.fr/fr/les-pretoires-ne-sont-pas-des-laboratoires. Retrieved 2021-06-07.
  13. ↑ "Site du sénat". https://www.senat.fr/basile/visio.do?id=qSEQ210623282&idtable=q354487%7Cq397890%7Cq390460%7Cq381719%7Cq370118%7Cq398561%7Cq376184%7Cq372285%7Cq376427&_c=parole+scientifique&rch=qs&de=20180611&au=20210611&dp=3+ans&radio=dp&aff=sep&tri=p&off=0&afd=ppr&afd=ppl&afd=pjl&afd=cvn. Retrieved 2021-06-11.
Retrieved from "http://192.168.1.3/mediawiki/index.php?title=Category:Didier_Raoult&oldid=152509"