Blog: Invalidation - 2014-03-19: Difference between revisions

From UmbraXenu
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "<div class="hnews hentry item">File:f0.png '''<span class="url entry-title">[http://mncriticalthinking.com/2014/03/19/invalidation/ Invalidation]</span>''' <span class="up...")
 
No edit summary
Line 28: Line 28:
[[Category:Golden Age of Tech]]
[[Category:Golden Age of Tech]]
[[Category:Hubbard Communication Office Bulletin]]
[[Category:Hubbard Communication Office Bulletin]]
[[Category:Inspector General Network]]
[[Category:Keep Scientology Working]]
[[Category:Keep Scientology Working]]
[[Category:L. Ron Hubbard]]
[[Category:L. Ron Hubbard]]

Revision as of 19:14, 19 August 2015

F0.png Invalidation March 19, 2014, Chris Shelton, Critical Thinker at Large

Originally posted December 26, 2013 on Mike Rinder's blog (here), under the pseudonym "Galactic Patrol".

The two greatest crimes that can be committed with Scientology technology are the two "shuns" – evaluation and invalidation. In numerous references, LRH explicitly details the destructive effects of evaluating for a person (telling him what to think about his case) or invalidating a person's case or gains.

In fact, invalidation is so powerful that in HCO PL 25 June 72, RECOVERING STUDENTS AND PCs, LRH states that "invalidation of case or gains" is one of only four things that will cause a preclear to blow Scientology entirely. I am quite sure that if you are reading this, you have witnessed at least one example of someone leaving Scientology over this kind of invalidation.