Blog: Invalidation - 2014-03-19: Difference between revisions
Dr Robotnik (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Dr Robotnik (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
[[Category:Chairman of the Board]] |
[[Category:Chairman of the Board]] |
||
[[Category:Chris Shelton]] |
[[Category:Chris Shelton]] |
||
[[Category:Class VI]] |
|||
[[Category:Clear]] |
[[Category:Clear]] |
||
[[Category:Clear Certainty Rundown]] |
[[Category:Clear Certainty Rundown]] |
||
Revision as of 23:21, 12 July 2016
Invalidation March 19, 2014,
Originally posted December 26, 2013 on Mike Rinder's blog (here), under the pseudonym "Galactic Patrol".
The two greatest crimes that can be committed with Scientology technology are the two "shuns" – evaluation and invalidation. In numerous references, LRH explicitly details the destructive effects of evaluating for a person (telling him what to think about his case) or invalidating a person's case or gains.
In fact, invalidation is so powerful that in HCO PL 25 June 72, RECOVERING STUDENTS AND PCs, LRH states that "invalidation of case or gains" is one of only four things that will cause a preclear to blow Scientology entirely. I am quite sure that if you are reading this, you have witnessed at least one example of someone leaving Scientology over this kind of invalidation.
- 1965
- 1970
- 1980
- 1996
- 1998
- 2003
- 2006
- 2013
- 2014
- Advanced Org
- Basics
- Blog post
- Chairman of the Board
- Chris Shelton
- Class VI
- Clear
- Clear Certainty Rundown
- Critical Thinker at Large
- David Miscavige
- Dianetics
- Golden Age of Tech
- Hubbard Communication Office Bulletin
- Inspector General Network
- Keep Scientology Working
- L. Ron Hubbard
- Mike Rinder
- NDA
- OT
- Quicky
- Religious Technology Center
- Saint Hill
- Student Hat