UmbraXenu:About: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Abbie Normal (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Abbie Normal (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
UmbraXenu is something of an off-Wikipedia project, with articles, information and documentation on Scientology and related topics, mainly conforming to Wikipedia policies on references, verifiability and neutral point of view. Probably somewhat looser on reliable sources, and definitely without all the politics and sabotage by cultic groups. |
UmbraXenu is something of an off-Wikipedia project, with articles, information and documentation on Scientology and related topics, mainly conforming to Wikipedia policies on references, verifiability and neutral point of view. Probably somewhat looser on reliable sources, and definitely without all the politics and sabotage by cultic groups. |
||
Note: While all [[:Category:News article|news articles]] here have a cite template for easy use on Wikipedia, they are not automatically [ |
Note: While all [[:Category:News article|news articles]] here have a cite template for easy use on Wikipedia, they are not automatically [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_source reliable sources], especially in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BLP biographies of living persons]. As well, articles may have links to [[:Category:Secondary copy|secondary source]] copies which are not acceptable. Please review and use judgement before boldly copy-pasting, and when in doubt, try for consensus on the Talk page first. |
||
Revision as of 16:26, 29 March 2014
UmbraXenu is something of an off-Wikipedia project, with articles, information and documentation on Scientology and related topics, mainly conforming to Wikipedia policies on references, verifiability and neutral point of view. Probably somewhat looser on reliable sources, and definitely without all the politics and sabotage by cultic groups.
Note: While all news articles here have a cite template for easy use on Wikipedia, they are not automatically reliable sources, especially in biographies of living persons. As well, articles may have links to secondary source copies which are not acceptable. Please review and use judgement before boldly copy-pasting, and when in doubt, try for consensus on the Talk page first.