Letters - 1950-08-14: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Dr Robotnik (talk | contribs) (Created page with "<div class="hnews hentry item">File:f54.png '''<span class="url entry-title">[http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,858874,00.html Letters]</span>''' <span class="updat...") |
Dr Robotnik (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="hnews hentry item">[[File:f54.png]] '''<span class="url entry-title">[http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,858874,00.html Letters]</span>''' <span class="updated">August 14, 1950</span>, <span class="author vcard"><span class="org organization-name">TIME Magazine</span></span> |
<div class="hnews hentry item">[[File:f54.png]] '''<span class="url entry-title">[http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,858874,00.html Letters]</span>''' <span class="updated">August 14, 1950</span>, <span class="author vcard"><span class="org organization-name">TIME Magazine</span></span> |
||
---- |
---- |
||
Our only regret is that you . . . mistook the publisher's synopsis in the book to be the opinion of the author. Los Angeles, while giving dianetics an excellent reception, is not entirely informed as to the science. Secondly, you would seem to make me over-evaluate dianetics in my own opinion. In 50 years a valid opinion as to what dianetics is doing or can do for the whole society may be expressed: I doubt anyone would be foolish enough to express such a wild enthusiasm about his own work, and I do not ... |
<span class="entry-content">Our only regret is that you . . . mistook the publisher's synopsis in the book to be the opinion of the author. Los Angeles, while giving dianetics an excellent reception, is not entirely informed as to the science. Secondly, you would seem to make me over-evaluate dianetics in my own opinion. In 50 years a valid opinion as to what dianetics is doing or can do for the whole society may be expressed: I doubt anyone would be foolish enough to express such a wild enthusiasm about his own work, and I do not ...</span> |
||
---- |
---- |
||
<code><nowiki>{{cite news | title = Letters | url = http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,858874,00.html | work = TIME Magazine | date = |
<code><nowiki>{{cite news | title = Letters | url = http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,858874,00.html | work = TIME Magazine | date = August 14, 1950 | accessdate = January 14, 2017 }}</nowiki></code> |
||
[[Category:1950]] |
[[Category:1950]] |
||
[[Category:L. Ron Hubbard]] |
[[Category:L. Ron Hubbard]] |
Revision as of 20:13, 14 January 2017
Letters August 14, 1950,
Our only regret is that you . . . mistook the publisher's synopsis in the book to be the opinion of the author. Los Angeles, while giving dianetics an excellent reception, is not entirely informed as to the science. Secondly, you would seem to make me over-evaluate dianetics in my own opinion. In 50 years a valid opinion as to what dianetics is doing or can do for the whole society may be expressed: I doubt anyone would be foolish enough to express such a wild enthusiasm about his own work, and I do not ...
{{cite news | title = Letters | url = http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,858874,00.html | work = TIME Magazine | date = August 14, 1950 | accessdate = January 14, 2017 }}