Blog: Reviewing the Headley ruling - 2012-08-06
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Reviewing the Headley ruling August 6, 2012,
Reviewing the Headley ruling August 6, 2012,
The U.S. Appeal court's rejection of the Headley lawsuits against Scientology is not carte blanche for future abuse, says the attorney who filed the original complaints: but the judgment still got it wrong, he argues.
On July 24, Barry Van Sickle got word of a California appeal court ruling in two lawsuits he had filed for former Scientologists against the movement more than three years earlier.
It was not good news.
Categories:
- 1985
- 1989
- 2005
- 2008
- 2009
- 2010
- 2011
- 2012
- Abortion
- Appeal
- Australia
- Barry Van Sickle
- Blog post
- Blow Drill
- Bluebird
- California
- Child labor
- Claire Headley
- David Miscavige
- Fair Work Ombudsman
- FBI
- First Amendment
- Freeloader Debt
- Golden Era
- Hemet
- Hollywood
- Human trafficking
- Infinite Complacency
- Int Base
- Internal Revenue Service
- IRS
- John Brousseau
- Jonny Jacobsen
- Judge Diarmuid O'Scannlain
- Lawsuit
- Legal
- Marc Headley
- Marty Rathbun
- Maureen Bolstad
- Ministerial exception
- Moving On Up a Little Higher
- New Yorker
- Quicky
- Rehabilitation Project Force
- Review
- Robert Levin
- Scott Pilutik
- Sea Org
- Sleep deprivation
- St. Petersburg Times
- Tampa Bay Times
- The Truth Rundown
- Tom Cruise
- Tony Ortega
- US Court of Appeals
- US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
- Village Voice
- Violence